Dreading the worst-timing-possible interview

December 26, 2011

I am dreading tomorrow’s job interview.

It’s not the interview itself that’s the problem.  I love the organization and I’ve wanted to work there for years.  The thing is, it’s probably going to force me to make some guesses that I don’t want to make.  At the very least, it will force me to lie.

I’ve been on a medical leave of absence from my current job for almost three months now.  When I left, I told them I would be gone three months.  I really believed I wouldn’t need longer, but I was clearly wrong.  I figure I need another month or two at least.  Scarily, it may be more.

I didn’t actively look for jobs while I was on leave.  To be honest, I don’t like my job, but I just didn’t have the energy to look for something else.  Then a friend emailed me that his company was looking to hire, and it’s a position that I’m qualified for.  I had told him many times to let me know if anything ever came up because I would love to work there, so I couldn’t pass this up.  It’s a part-time job, which on the downside means less money, but then again, it would be better for my health.

So what’s the problem?  If they want someone to start right away, I can’t.  Even for part-time work, I’m just not ready for it.  Too many days I feel lousy.  Just going to the job interview will be all the activity I can handle tomorrow.  And when they ask about my current job, which they will, I’ll have to talk in the present tense, as if I’ve actually been doing the work recently.  I will have to lie by omission and not tell them I’m on leave.  When they ask why I want part-time work, I will have to say that I’ve been wanting a better work-life balance.  This is true, but it sure does avoid the most obvious reason.  And if they actually do offer me the job at some point, which is possible, what would I say?  Would I be ready to work?  I just can’t imagine.

The timing of this is lousy.  Up until 6 months ago, it would have been so easy to just go 110% for this job.  Now, I’m not sure if it’s even worth going to the interview.  Someplace in the back of my brain I know that it’s good to keep my options open, but really, I’d rather just hide under the bed for a while.  I know there’s some positivity somewhere in me.  I sure hope I can get it out in time for the interview.

 

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook, Twitter, etc. This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.

And if you’d like to get these posts emailed to you for free, simply click the “Sign me up!” button in the top right corner.

2 Comments | Decisions, Expectations, Frustration, Job, Limitations, Rants, Symptoms, Unpredictable | Permalink
Posted by chronicrants

Ode to my kick-ass coat

December 24, 2011

My winter coat rocks.  No, really.  It’s one of the best purchases I’ve ever made.  It may even be the best.

Think about it: how many items do you have that can directly improve your symptoms?  Yesterday I ate something that was great; the same dish made me incredibly sick the day before.  Good old IBS.

Last week I had fun picking up and holding my friends’ cat; today picking up that same cat hurt.  Good old connective tissue disease.

Two nights ago I slept for 7 hours and woke up feeling great; last night I slept for 8 hours and woke up feeling exhausted.  I took a 2 hour nap this afternoon and am still exhausted.  Good old autoimmune issues.

So what’s my point?  My point is that my wonderful coat protects me.  Today it was 28 degrees (F) when I left the house.  I have Raynaud’s.  This isn’t the worst of my problems, even when I don’t address it, but keeping in check can definitely help the other issues.  Luckily, I don’t have a severe version of it.  If I keep my core temperature warm, the rest isn’t as bad.

And this is where the coat comes in.  I have a “normal” wool coat that I wear when it’s in the 40s, and even in the upper 30s.  But when it gets below about 35 degrees, I pull out the monster down coat.  This thing is big.  It’s pink (oops – in the catalogue it looked red, but I wanted to wear it right away instead of exchanging it.)  I am short and this thing looks pretty silly on me.  A friend told me that I look like a big pink penguin; I wish she was wrong.  But it’s warm!  I can’t emphasize that enough.  Maybe I look silly, but I see people walking around with hunched shoulders, shivering, in coats that clearly aren’t good enough.  When I wear this thing, it feels like I’m wrapped in a sleeping bag, all warm and cozy.  As you can see, it zips high and has a big hood closure that covers and protects half of my face.  If I’m not driving, I always put my hands in the pockets without gloves and they stay perfectly warm.  I haven’t found a pair of gloves yet that comes close to working as well for my hands as those pockets.  With some good boots keeping my feet warm, the Raynaud’s stays at bay and I feel perfectly comfortable.  It’s wonderful!

Several years ago I spent approximately $120 for this amazing coat and it was worth every single penny.  If you live in a cold place and you can afford it, go out and get the best coat you can – it’s worth it.  You may look silly, but you’ll be warm!

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook, Twitter, etc. This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.

And if you’d like to get these posts emailed to you for free, simply click the “Sign me up!” button in the top right corner.

2 Comments | Decisions, Expectations, Medication, Raves, Symptoms | Permalink
Posted by chronicrants

Are there enough doctors?

December 21, 2011

According to this article, the largest concentration of doctors in the United States is right here in Massachusetts.  So then why am I having so much trouble finding one I like?

Keep in mind, this is based on a per capita count, so it’s about how many doctors there are for every 100,000 residents and not on how many there are total.  Compared to the national average, good old Mass. is going great.  Of course, this doesn’t tell us how many of these doctors are specialists and how many are internists or family practitioners.  It also doesn’t tell us how many of them treat patients full time versus focusing on research.  For example, I have one doctor, a specialist, who does research most days and only sees patients two days a week.  How would he be counted?

But more than any of that, my big concern is that this article speaks about the distribution of doctors as if that were the biggest problem with getting a doctor.  Let’s forget about money, because that’s a different problem altogether.  What bothers me is the idea that if doctors were distributed more evenly, everything would automatically work out better.  But has anyone checked to see if there are enough doctors in this country?  Sure, Massachusetts has more doctors per capita than any other state, but does it have enough doctors?  Does it have the right type of doctors?  I called many potential PCPs this year and was told by each that they weren’t taking on new patients.  That’s in line with what I have been reading about PCP shortages.

Now, maybe I just called the wrong ones.  Maybe there’s a shortage.  Maybe that was a temporary problem that was magically fixed the next week.  Regardless, we need to figure out how many doctors, and what specialties, are needed in order to properly care for our population.  I agree that we need to have an even distribution of doctors, but that only works if there are enough.

 

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook, Twitter, etc. This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.

And if you’d like to get these posts emailed to you for free, simply click the “Sign me up!” button in the top right corner.

Leave a Comment » | Educating, Frustration, Healthcare, Politics, Rants | Permalink
Posted by chronicrants

Scary changes in healthcare

December 20, 2011

How much control do you have over your healthcare?

Now, many of us have limited control over our health, but we should at least have control over our healthcare, right?  I don’t know what the answer is, but it can’t be this.

I read this morning about a plan by a local health insurer to reimburse patients for choosing cheaper care.  Well, that’s the basic idea, anyway.  If my doctor sends me for an MRI at site X and instead I go to the cheaper site Y, then I’ll get $10-75 from my health insurer.

This troubles me in many ways.  To keep myself from rambling, here’s a quick bullet list:

  • Will the care be comparable?  Or will patients lose out?
  • People suffering financially may put their money ahead of their health.  I admit that this is their choice, but is it really a choice?  After all, premiums won’t be cut, so this is their only chance for relief.
  • This may make it harder for doctors to coordinate care.  When I get a test done now, all doctors in that hospital system see the results.  If I get a test done elsewhere, I’d have to get the results sent to all of my doctors, which is unlikely to happen, so the burden would be on me to bring the results of all tests with me to all appointments.
  • There are already health plans that only allow patients to be seen by cheaper doctors at cheaper facilities.  How much farther will this cost-cutting expand?  I don’t get to choose my health plan – my employer does.  If they choose one of these, I might have to change all of my doctors, and it has taken me years to build up a medical team I trust.
  • If cutting costs is so important, why doesn’t the health insurer cap reimbursement payments?  Wouldn’t that make more sense?  Why reimburse one site more than another?

Really, what upsets me is the direction of healthcare changes.  Health insurers and politicians are floundering to find a way to save money and stop the skyrocketing costs to patients and employers.  There is talk of a single payer system in my state.  While I love the idea theoretically, I have seen the way it has been put into practice in other countries, and I don’t trust it.  Really, do I want anyone involved in my government to decide if it’s cost-effective for me to take a certain medication or have a certain test?  No!  I trust them even less than I trust health insurers – I guess I trust the devil I know more than the devil I suspect.  If my health insurer chooses not to cover the cost of something, I can appeal within the insurance company and also to a state board.  If the state were in charge, who would I be able to appeal to?  Costs are too high.  People can’t afford care.  Those of us that can afford it, often pay so much that we must cut back on other things (like ever being able to afford to retire.)  This just isn’t working.

We need a solution.  So many of us are desperate for a solution.  If only I had any idea whatsoever what it might be.

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook, Twitter, etc. This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.

And if you’d like to get these posts emailed to you for free, simply click the “Sign me up!” button in the top right corner.

Leave a Comment » | Educating, Expectations, Frustration, Healthcare, Medication, Politics, Rants | Permalink
Posted by chronicrants

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »