Political interference

November 27, 2011

Politics affects all of us.  It has to.  Government builds and maintains infrastructure (roads, mass transit) and regulates taxes.  Government creates laws and enforces them.  Government controls the big picture and also a lot of minutiae.  It must play a role in our lives, but I question how big of a role.

Because of my illness, I rely on my government to create and enforce non-discrimination laws, to keep the roads and sidewalks passable, and to ensure that the medications I take are safe for consumption.  These are all important.  However, I feel that sometimes government goes too far in “protecting” its citizens.  I will write more later, but for now, think about medical marijuana and assisted suicide.  How involved should the government be?

In the United States, one big problem is that some states have legalized each of these, but the federal government does not recognize them as legal.  That sets patients and doctors up for potential problems, and that’s not fair.  It must be decided once and for all whether or not states can regulate either of these areas.

As far as marijuana goes, I won’t get into whether or not I think it should be legal for general use.  However, for medicinal purposes it should be treated like any other drug.  There should be studies to determine its efficacy, then it should be subjected to an FDA approval process to ensure it is safe for medicinal use.  Why not do this?  After all, it is no more harmful to a person than alcohol, cigarettes, or many prescription medications.  It is not dangerous to non-users as long as second-hand smoke is avoided (it could follow the same rules as cigarettes) and people do not drive under the influence (it should follow the same rules as alcohol.)  I would happily accept government regulation of medical marijuana so that I could trust that it came from good sources.  I can not accept, though, that the government will not even consider it.  Given the choice between the side effects from marijuana or the side effects from prednisone, I’ll choose pot, thank you very much.

Now, as for assisted suicide, the idea that suicide is illegal is ludicrous.  A person who wants to commit suicide should get proper counseling, of course, and be of sound mind.  But if a terminally ill person is in a lot of pain and wants to end their suffering a few weeks early, why shouldn’t they be allowed to make that choice?  And if they are going to end their suffering early, shouldn’t it be done with the aid of a doctor, so that it is done in the least painful way possible?  I simply can not imagine why people have a problem with this.  And I certainly can not see any reason why the government should be regulating it.

These are just my opinions, of course.  Everyone needs to do their own research and their own thinking.  For me, though, the answers seem very clear.  My opinions are strong, so I will definitely be elaborating on these in later posts.  For now, I just needed to vent a bit.

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook and/or Twitter.  This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.  

And if you’d like to get these posts emailed to you for free, simply click the “Sign me up!” button in the top right corner.


My personal cure-all

November 26, 2011

We all know there’s no such thing as a cure-all.  If there were, we’d all know about it and be getting it.  Still, I’d like to think that everyone has something that will make them feel at least a little bit better.  It might be a certain movie, a piece of artwork, or a friend.  For me, it’s dogs.

I’m not suggesting that dogs cure me.  That would be ridiculous.  But if I feel good, dogs make me happier.  If I feel bad, they make me feel a little less bad.  This has been a tough week, but spending the evening with a sweet dog who I love, plus a new puppy, made me feel so much better.  No, I’m not completely well, but I’m better than I was before seeing the dogs, and I’m certain that I’m better than I would have been if they weren’t there.

There’s one dog in particular who is amazing.  He’s very intuitive.  When someone is ill, he comforts them.  My parents are very lucky to have him.  When I have been at their house while ill, he will stay by my side.  He’s often a lap dog, but eventually he wants to play.  When I feel sick, though, he just curls up by my side, his little furry body radiating warmth and love, and I start to feel better.  He just stays there until I start to improve.  There are studies that say petting a dog or a cat can lower a person’s blood pressure.  I don’t need to read a study.  I feel it every time he jumps into my lap.

So yes, I am the absurd 30-something who will stop strangers on the street and ask to pet their dog.  But why not?  It makes me feel better, it makes me happy, the dogs love the attention, and the owners love hearing strangers say how sweet their dog is.  Everyone wins.  We all need something that makes us feel better, and for me it comes in a furry form.  I can’t have a dog of my own (I’m not well enough to care for it) but I’ll spend time with others’ dogs whenever I can.  They are amazing animals.

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook and/or Twitter.  This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.  And if you’d like to get these posts emailed to you for free, simply click the “Sign me up!” button in the top right corner.


Searching for fairness in healthcare

November 17, 2011

Continuing yesterday’s theme of the screwed up health care system, I just read this article about special medical services to give second opinions.  They reevaluate diagnoses and treatments and make changes as needed.

Now, doctors make mistakes.  They are human.  It happens.  I think it is responsible of patients to get second opinions.  So you may be wondering why I think this is a problem.  Here’s why: this service isn’t available to everyone!  I just looked at the Best Doctors web site, since they’re located near me, and I saw that the service is offered only through employers!  This is like the FSA situation, where only some people have access to a fantastic benefit.

Back in the day it made sense to tie health benefits to employment, but is that still really the case?  For those of you living outside of the United States you probably think this is completely nuts.  You’re right!  I’m certainly not about to defend this system.  Why should I get better health insurance now because of where I work than I had the last 10 years (my entire independent working life)?  If I change jobs, why should my benefits change?  If I get a new job that pays more or less or is located someplace else, those aspects will affect my life.  That makes sense.  What doesn’t make sense is that the amount I pay for medical costs will change.  What doesn’t make sense is that I may have to get new doctors.  What doesn’t make sense is that my medication may not longer be covered by health insurance.

Congress failed.  Yes, untangling health insurance from employment would be a huge undertaking, but wouldn’t it be worth it?  Mandating that employers provide health insurance sounds good, until you realize that many will provide only the minimum, and that this doesn’t help the unemployed at all.  We need a system is that is fair for everyone.  We should accept nothing less.

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook and/or Twitter.  This blog is new, and it would be great to share it.


Too many disease treatment options

November 10, 2011

Too much information!

I read about a study done recently.  I don’t remember the details, but basically when people have more options available, they have more difficulty choosing an option.  They also feel more stress.  Basically, having a choice of 2 salad dressings is better than having a choice of 15 salad dressings.

This makes perfect sense.  I see it in so many places.  The last time I got a car, I picked a few good brands and looked only at their models.  I didn’t look at the others because it would have been too many options and that’s stressful and difficult.  Today in the grocery store there were too many types of bread.  I’m not kidding; I found myself spending way too long in the bakery section trying to choose the right loaf.  I need to get a gift for someone next week and I have a few ideas, but I just can not seem to decide which they will like best.  I’d rather just have 1 idea.

See the conundrum?  Despite what most of us think, having too many choices is actually a bad thing!

And that brings me to today’s too-many-choices problem: treatment options.  I want to take a new approach to treating my health problems but I don’t know how to go about it.  Which approach should I take?  The answer, of course, is to do research.  The problem is that so many of the alternative treatments are based on anecdotal evidence.  There are a bunch of diets, for example.  One works for some people, another works for other people.  In the meantime, I’ll be spending a lot of time and effort trying to add some things to my diet while removing others, and trying not to aggravate my IBS in the process.  And how should I balance everything?  There are diets for IBS and others for PCOS and others for Hashimoto’s and others for connective tissue diseases and and and….. How do I put these together?  I know my doctors won’t be advising me on this.  I tried going to a nutritionist once and she helped with an IBS diet but didn’t know about the others.  There may be nutritionists who specialize in these autoimmune disease diets but I don’t know who they are or how to find them.

I know I need to pursue this, but it’s so overwhelming.  Having all of these different options makes me want to just bury my head in the sand and wait for it to pass.  The problem is, it won’t pass.  These symptoms aren’t going away.  I need to do something proactive.  I just wish I knew what it was.

 

If any of this sounds familiar, if you can relate, please share it on Facebook and/or Twitter so others know it’s not just them, that they’re not alone.